US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 3,371
Horseman v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01453
Petitioner:
Scott Michael Horseman
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Fhuere
as 6:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Michael Cooper
Defendant:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cuevas v. Fhuere
as 6:2023cv01463
Petitioner:
Santos Cuevas
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Billingsley v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01445
Petitioner:
Sean Blake Billingsley
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Urbina v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01436
Petitioner:
Flavio Urbina
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Highberger
as 6:2023cv01426
Petitioner:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Respondent:
J. Highberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clingman v. State of Oregon
as 3:2023cv01414
Petitioner:
Jeremy Clingman
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Brown
as 3:2023cv01401
Petitioner:
Lee Winford Gibson
Respondent:
Steve Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Harrold
as 6:2023cv01398
Petitioner:
Spencer Joseph Barrett
Respondent:
Sheriff Clifton Harrold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Decker v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2023cv01383
Petitioner:
Mariah Reney Decker
Respondent:
Multnomah County, State of Oregon and Nicole Morrissey O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
