US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 181 - 190 of 3,370
York v. State of Oregon
as 3:2023cv01054
Petitioner: Nicholas T. York
Respondent: State of Oregon and Superintendent Amber Sundquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. FBI
as 6:2023cv01050
Petitioner: Ronnie Walker
Respondent: FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Kotek
as 6:2023cv01048
Petitioner: Ronnie Walker
Respondent: Tina Kotek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Taylor v. Randall et al
as 3:2023cv01039
Petitioner: Nimrod B.H. Taylor
Respondent: Christopher Randall and Ms. Sundquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Fhuere
as 6:2023cv01023
Petitioner: Joshua Ray Richards
Respondent: Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huskey v. Highberger
as 6:2023cv01029
Petitioner: Arnold R. Huskey
Respondent: Josh Highberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tran v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01017
Petitioner: Douglas Tran
Respondent: Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turner v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01002
Petitioner: Daniel Turner
Respondent: Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beltran v. Jaquez
as 3:2023cv00987
Petitioner: Anthony Joseph Beltran
Respondent: Warden Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Navarro v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00976
Petitioner: Rosendo Garcia Navarro
Respondent: Warden DeWayne Hendrix and Warden Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?