US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 142
BAEZ v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2012cv03627
Petitioner:
ORLANDO BAEZ
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS S. FOLINO, MARIROSA LAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOUSER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv01792
Petitioner:
DARIEN HOUSER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
OGROD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv06366
Petitioner:
WALTER OGROD
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIGGS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv06246
Petitioner:
JUNIOUS G DIGGS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS S. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv06245
Petitioner:
KENNETH MILLER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS S. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv06247
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OVERBY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv05616
Petitioner:
LAMONT OVERBY
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2011cv04681
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MARIROSA LAMAS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR LEHIGH COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GIBSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv04550
Petitioner:
RONALD GIBSON
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , JEFF MARTIN and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2011cv04402
Petitioner:
KAREEM JOHNSON
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
