US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 301
HOLT v. HEASLEY'S NURSERIES, INC.
as 2:2020cv01907
Defendant:
HEASLEY'S NURSERIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
SAXON HOLT
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
ANSYS, INC. v. ACTOX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv01694
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, AL HATSET and ACTOX CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ANSYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
KIRKLAND v. KKURATED LLC. et al
as 2:2020cv01298
Defendant:
KKURATED LLC. a Pennsylvania Limited Liability Company doing business as "KKurated.com" and DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS KIRKLAND
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ANSYS, INC. v. AIRTECH GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00889
Defendant:
AIRTECH VACUUM, INC, AIRTECH GROUP, INC., MIKE SUTTER and others
Plaintiff:
ANSYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ANSYS, INC. v. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES et al
as 2:2020cv00488
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, SVETLANA VASEY, AKHIL SETH and others
Plaintiff:
ANSYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ANSYS, INC. v. SF MOTORS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00352
Defendant:
JAMES TAYLOR, DOES 1 THROUGH 10, SF MOTORS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANSYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ADLIFE MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS CO. INC. v. VISTAMONT FARMS, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00332
Defendant:
VISTAMONT FARMS, LLC and ADAM ASARIAN
Plaintiff:
ADLIFE MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MARKOS v. THOMAS TOURS, INC.
as 2:2020cv00228
Defendant:
THOMAS TOURS, INC.
Plaintiff:
STEVE MARKOS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
ADLIFE MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, INC. v. NASER FOODS
as 2:2020cv00053
Plaintiff:
ADLIFE MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
NASER FOODS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ADLIFE MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, INC. v. MI DI, INC.
as 2:2020cv00051
Plaintiff:
ADLIFE MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
MI DI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
