District of Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 33,911
HAKE et al v. CITY OF SHARON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00957
Plaintiff: SHAWN R. HAKE , CYNTHIA L. LOYA
Defendant: CITY OF SHARON POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOE NUMBER 2 and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
WANAMAKER v. D.O.C. et al
as 3:2017cv00133
Petitioner: DARREN L. WANAMAKER
Defendant: D.O.C., JUDITH BLOOM, TREVOR WEINGARD
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
MUNOZ v. KUTA
as 3:2017cv00132
Petitioner: MIGUEL ANGEL PANIAGUA MUNOZ
Respondent: S. M. KUTA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. R & R POOLS & CONSTRUCTION et al
as 2:2017cv00951
Plaintiff: ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: R & R POOLS & CONSTRUCTION, FRANK A. AMATO, SR., EILEEN AMATO
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
SPICKERMAN v. LINCOLN LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY OF NEW YORK
as 2:2017cv00955
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HAMMOND v. KRAK et al
as 2:2017cv00952
Plaintiff: KHALIL HAMMOND
Defendant: ROBERT M. KRAK, LOUIS FOLINO, IRMA VIHLIDAL and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GUZMAN v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00199
Plaintiff: YAHAIRA GUZMAN
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STEWART v. WARDEN, SCI HOUTZDALE
as 3:2017cv00131
Petitioner: JERRY SHON STEWART
Respondent: WARDEN, SCI HOUTZDALE
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRADLEY v. CLARK et al
as 1:2017cv00196
Petitioner: TRACY R. BRADLEY
Respondent: MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLETCHER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE
as 3:2017cv00130
Petitioner: DEMETRIUS FLETCHER
Respondent: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?