District of Cases

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 37,489
LUSTER v. TRATE
as 1:2019cv00012
Petitioner: DAVID ANTOINE LUSTER
Defendant: WARDEN TRATE
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00009
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
MOTON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv00008
Defendant: DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT, DORINE VARNER and others
Plaintiff: MYRON MOTON
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
WARE v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2019cv00034
Petitioner: ANDRE WARE
Respondent: MARK CAPOZZA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ETLING v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv00035
Plaintiff: EDITH ETLING
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
MOLSON v. MONTGOMERY
as 1:2019cv00011
Defendant: CRAIG MONTGOMERY
Plaintiff: ROWENA MOLSON
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
HILL-JOHNSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2019cv00030
Plaintiff: DAELON HILL-JOHNSON
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
B. et al v. UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPNAY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00031
Plaintiff: Amy B., T. Sebastian B., Richard B.
Defendant: United Healthcare Insurance, United Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
WAULK v. CAMBRIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
as 3:2019cv00007
Plaintiff: JACK N. WAULK
Defendant: CAMBRIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
SOTO v. MOSER
as 3:2019cv00006
Petitioner: JOEL SOTO
Respondent: V. MOSER
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?