US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,368
FOLAND v. CONTI et al
as 2:2022cv00442
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWARD FOLAND
Defendant:
ROCKI CONTI, RON HOGUE, RIC FLITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAMISON v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA LAMISON and CHRISTY LAMISON
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MAZANETZ v. LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
BETTY MAZANETZ
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BUSCH v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
BRANDON BUSCH
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ZITO v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
KYLI ZITO
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KEISTER v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
as 2:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
MELISSA KEISTER
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STARR v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
DEMARR STARR
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WRIGHT v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC
as 2:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
TALESHA WRIGHT
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DICARLO v. FIRST COMMONWEALTH BANK et al
as 2:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
JOHN DICARLO
Defendant:
FIRST COMMONWEALTH BANK and TRANS UNION LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LATUSEK v. CONSOL ENERGY, INC.
as 2:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
THEODORE M. LATUSEK, JR.
Defendant:
CONSOL ENERGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
