US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 40
SCOTT v. REDMAN
as 2:2015cv00903
Plaintiff:
NORMA SCOTT
Defendant:
DONALD REDMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STROM v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2014cv01518
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN M. STROM
Defendant:
THOMAS W. CORBETT, KATHLEEN KANE and ANNETTE TIERNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLHOUSE et al v. GORELL et al
as 3:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
CINDY A. ALLHOUSE , TAMMY S. ARBLE , JAMES M. BLAIR and others
Defendant:
WAYNE GORELL and BRIAN ZIMMERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEANGELO v. NORTH STRABANE TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2013cv00407
Plaintiff:
DALE DEANGELO
Defendant:
NORTH STRABANE TOWNSHIP and DAN STRIMEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAN TASSEL v. HODGE et al
as 2:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
LYNN A. VAN TASSEL
Defendant:
JOHN W. HODGE , THOMAS M. PICCIONE , LAWRENCE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
BUCKSHAW et al v. STARK et al
as 2:2012cv01217
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW and J. J. BUCKSHAW & ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
JAY STARK and MARK F. ECKHART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
VANDERFORD v. AUGENSTEIN
as 2:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. VANDERFORD
Defendant:
SUZANNE AUGENSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ROYER v. PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2011cv00318
Plaintiff:
PHIL ROYER
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
ZELIENOPLE AIRPORT AUTHORITY v. LANCASTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2010cv01601
Plaintiff:
ZELIENOPLE AIRPORT AUTHORITY
Defendant:
LANCASTER TOWNSHIP, DENNIS KERR, JOHN MEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRYAN v. LAWYERS GUILD OF GREAT BRITAIN et al
as 2:2010cv01259
Plaintiff:
LINDA J. BRYAN
Defendant:
LAWYERS GUILD OF GREAT BRITAIN, ANY AND ALL INTERNATIONAL BANKERS, THE UNITED NATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
