US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 704
MOUTINHO v. BLAKE et al
as 3:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS MOUTINHO
Defendant:
ROBERT L. BLAKE and JODI A. BRINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
PERRY v. WESTERN EXPRESS, INC.
as 2:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PERRY
Defendant:
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
NAPIER v. YALAH et al
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY NAPIER
Defendant:
SAMAKAB YALAH, RD EXPEDITED, INC., YALAH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
CARNAHAN v. CURTIS
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
ANN CARNAHAN
Defendant:
BRANDON M. CURTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
PARK et al v. ARREOLA et al
as 2:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
ROY E. PARK and DEBORAH PARK
Defendant:
RYAN M. ARREOLA and PEPPER MECHANICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DALENA v. LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
BRYAN T. DALENA
Defendant:
LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
THOMPKINS v. TAIGA BUILDING PRODUCTS, LTD et al
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY THOMPKINS, SR.
Defendant:
TAIGA BUILDING PRODUCTS, LTD and NET FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
PATTERSON v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
LESTER PATTERSON
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
LE v. NEHRER
as 2:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
TIEN LE
Defendant:
DANIEL NEHRER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
PETERSON v. MURROW'S TRANSFER, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
SHEILA K. PETERSON
Defendant:
MURROW'S TRANSFER, INC., MT FAIRFIELD, LLC and LOGAN J. DENNY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
