US District Court for the District of South Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 341
Ortega v. Palmetto GBA, LLC
as 3:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Anna Ortega
Defendant:
Palmetto GBA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Wright v. Sea Hunt Boat Manufacturing Co., Inc.
as 3:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Tanika Wright
Defendant:
Sea Hunt Boat Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Harrington v. Resort Management and Consulting Group, LLC
as 9:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Richard Harrington
Defendant:
Resort Management and Consulting Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Howard v. Prisma Health
as 3:2023cv07054
Plaintiff:
Tarnikia Howard
Defendant:
Prisma Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Bryant v. South Carolina Federal Credit Union
as 2:2023cv06341
Plaintiff:
Myeshia Bryant
Defendant:
South Carolina Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Turner v. QC Franchise Group LLC
as 7:2023cv05910
Plaintiff:
Brandice Turner
Defendant:
QC Franchise Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Harrison v. County of Anderson
as 8:2023cv05875
Plaintiff:
Melissa Harrison
Defendant:
County of Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Lane v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC
as 9:2023cv05803
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lane
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hill v. Whitten Center et al
as 6:2023cv05731
Plaintiff:
Marteebia Hill
Defendant:
Whitten Center, Elizabeth Redd and Craig Byrd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
LaDuke v. The Boeing Company
as 2:2023cv05698
Plaintiff:
Derrick R. LaDuke
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
