US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,317
Goodwyn v. Ozment et al
as 2:2023cv02764
Plaintiff:
Desmond Goodwyn
Defendant:
Dawn Ozment and TDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02763
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Floyd Bonner, Jr. and Chief Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
G'Andre V Fields
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hogan v. Dandridge
as 2:2023cv02747
Plaintiff:
Kahan Ali Hogan
Defendant:
Patrick J. Dandridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marilyn Donald, et al v. Bonner, et al
as 2:2023cv02738
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Kirk Fields, Shelby County and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Donald and Charles Donald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rudd v. Mays
as 2:2023cv02721
Plaintiff:
Latanua K. Rudd
Defendant:
Samuel H. Mays, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cathey v. CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT) et al
as 2:2023cv02707
Plaintiff:
Colton Cathey
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), Cerelyn Davis, John Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. City of Germantown et al
as 2:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
Tamika Jones
Defendant:
City of Germantown, Robert M Brannon, Kevin Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02712
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Holmes
Defendant:
Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd vs. City of Memphis, et al
as 2:2023cv02693
Plaintiff:
Ricky Todd
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, Samuel Voller and W. French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
