US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 11,945
Johnson County DA v. Wright
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Johnson County DA
Defendant:
Randall Eugene Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Douglas Deon Brown
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Eddie Garcia, Officer Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrera et al v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr., Tyron Dyeralle Davis, Cesar Rueda and others
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coker v. Coker
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Todd Coker
Defendant:
Jim Coker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Unknown et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Martin
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Latonia Smith
Defendant:
Warden Smith, DOE Captain, Lt. FNU Recoder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melka v. Franklin et al
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Dagim Melka
Defendant:
Deputy Franklin, Brian Wetzell, City of Wylie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Probst v. Beckett
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
James Edward Probst
Defendant:
A Beckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowan v. Seesar et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Felix Lyle Cowan
Defendant:
Christopher Seesar, Jack B Wienstien, David Hittner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
