US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,985
English v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01322
Petitioner:
James-Thomas English
Respondent:
The United States of America, The State of Texas, Fort Bend County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lynch v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01276
Petitioner:
Aldede Lynch
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Antonio A Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01305
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dale v. Warden FPC Bryan
as 4:2024cv01233
Petitioner:
Veronica Dale
Respondent:
Warden FPC Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01262
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elizondo v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Jaime Elizondo
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soliz v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Jesus Soliz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ghose v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Sayantan Ghose
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01205
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
