US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 27,313
Strieder v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01065
Petitioner:
Karen Marie Strieder
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pradia v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01045
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Pradia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Vallejo Recio v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Daniel Vallejo Recio
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vallego v. Ed Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Santiago Vallego
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Sgt. Waller and D.O. A. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01097
Petitioner:
Nelson Alexander Polk
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stewart v. Rayford
as 4:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stewart
Defendant:
Dan Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rehman v. United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:19-cr-254.
as 4:2024cv00995
Petitioner:
Afzal Arsalan Rehman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Whitaker v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00994
Petitioner:
Ryan Jivaro Whitaker
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
