US District Court for the Western District of Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 9,698
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Spratlen v Rainey
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Matthew Seth Spratlen
Defendant:
John Rainey, Mark Anthony Luna, Guadalupe Pineda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Labee v. Hillcrest Bank NBH Chris Randle
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
John Labee
Defendant:
Hillcrest Bank NBH Chris Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Carmona et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Gonzalez, Jr.
Defendant:
Julio Carmona, Peter Torres, Juan Palafox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nadeau et al v. Travis County et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Philip Nadeau and Roland Nadeau
Defendant:
Travis County, Canales, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
