US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 7,589
Berrocal v. Salazar
as 5:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Henry B. Berrocal
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohsin Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohsin Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guzman v. Warden, USP Marion
as 5:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Ricardo Guzman
Respondent:
Warden, USP Marion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Benny Bundy and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carbajal v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Jorge L. Carbajal
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Massey v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ross Massey
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinonez Venegas v. Warden, FCI Forrest City
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Sergio Ivan Quinonez Venegas
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Forrest City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pate v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Frank Edwin Pate
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
