US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,445
Jackson v. White
as 2:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Wayne Alexander Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yeverton v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Rashauwn X. Yeverton
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salahuddin v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Khalil A. Salahuddin
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Navarro v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez-Navarro
Respondent:
Virginia Commonwealth of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sprouse v. VA Director of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Derek Sprouse
Respondent:
VA Director of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savage v. Lue
as 2:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
Kenneth S. Savage
Respondent:
D. Lue and D. Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hayes v. Clarke
as 1:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
Mark Hayes
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Clark
as 1:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
James Robert Nelson
Respondent:
Harold Clark and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
Adrian Porter
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newby v. Leu
as 1:2024cv00225
Petitioner:
Robbie Lynn Newby
Respondent:
David Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
