US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,675
Lawson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2023cv00788
Petitioner:
Michael D. Lawson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lipford v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
Keon Deshea Lipford
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Director of DOC
as 7:2023cv00776
Petitioner:
Adrian Isaiah Gray
Respondent:
Director of DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00771
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Franklin
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval and D.O.J. (FBOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Delorenzo v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00760
Petitioner:
Frank Delorenzo
Respondent:
Mr. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Minor v. Unknown
as 7:2023cv00751
Petitioner:
Antoine L. Minor
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sloan v. Court
as 7:2023cv00745
Petitioner:
Claude Sloan
Respondent:
Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00743
Petitioner:
Dayomic J. Smith
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson and D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saunders v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Darrell Jermaine Saunders
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Mrs. Bethany and A.S. Harrison
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barksdale v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00724
Petitioner:
Kimberly Mayhew Barksdale
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
