US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Torts - Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 197
In Re: Civil Investigation Demand 11-233 Investigation of CH2M Hill Hanford Group Inc Issued to Patrick Bradley Brannan
as 2:2012cv03013
Respondent:
Patrick Bradley Brannan
Petitioner:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: False Claims Act
Sung v. Mission Valley Renewable Energy LLC et al
as 2:2011cv05163
Plaintiff:
Charles C Sung
Defendant:
Mission Valley Renewable Energy LLC, William McKay , Cynthia McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Hay et al
as 2:2011cv05154
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amy Hay, Patricia Hall and Michael Stone
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
McLanahan v. Moses Lake Police Department et al
as 2:2011cv00398
Plaintiff:
Tim McLanahan
Defendant:
Moses Lake Police Department and Grant County Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLanahan v. United States Government
as 2:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
Tim McLanahan
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLanahan v. All Media et al
as 2:2011cv00390
Plaintiff:
Tim McLanahan
Defendant:
All Media, Motion Picture, Music DVD CD Tour Promoters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLanahan v. McLanahan et al
as 2:2011cv00380
Plaintiff:
Tim McLanahan
Defendant:
Larry McLanahan, Moses Lake Clinic, Grant County Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLanahan v. U S Government et al
as 2:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
Tim McLanahan
Defendant:
U S Government, Costco Warehouse Stores and Lowenthal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
McLanahan v. All Wireless Companies
as 2:2011cv00383
Plaintiff:
Tim McLanahan
Defendant:
All Wireless Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLanahan v. Obama
as 2:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Tim McLanahan
Defendant:
Barrack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
