Northern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 3,431
Pumphrey v. Coakley et al
as 3:2017cv00140
Plaintiff: William C. Pumphrey
Defendant: J. Coakley , S. Ellis , T. Koch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. Rardin
as 2:2017cv00136
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Antrobius v. Ballard
as 1:2017cv00194
Petitioner: Frank E. Antrobius
Respondent: David R. Ballard
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sumlin v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2017cv00168
Petitioner: Robert L. Sumlin
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. United States et al
as 2:2017cv00134
Plaintiff: Prince Jones
Defendant: United States, J. Riffle, T. George and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Adams v. Saad
as 3:2017cv00135
Petitioner: Kenneth Adams
Respondent: Jennifer Saad
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. Health Care Administrator et al
as 1:2017cv00191
Plaintiff: Robert Wright
Defendant: Health Care Administrator, Joseph Coakley, J Tarovisky and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Kallis et al
as 5:2017cv00164
Plaintiff: Dontez Johnson
Defendant: S. Kallis, Dunn, Other Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Minor v. Coakley
as 2:2017cv00133
Petitioner: Antwan Minor
Respondent: Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller v. United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia et al
as 2:2017cv00132
Plaintiff: Teresa Miller
Defendant: United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, United States District Court for the Fourth Circuit
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?