US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Real Property Cases

Land Condemnation Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Mullens v. McKittrick et al
as 2:2010cv00022
Petitioner: Robert A. Mullens
Respondent: Thomas M. McKittrick, Brant Light, Jay Parrott and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
Weidlich and Associates Inc. v. The City of Dunbar et al
as 2:2008cv01185
Plaintiff: Weidlich and Associates Inc.
Defendant: The City of Dunbar, The Dunbar City Counsel, The Dunbar Planning and Zoning Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain and 10-Inch Natural Gas Pipeline over 3.375 Acres, More or Less, Across Three Parcels Located in Jackson County, WV et al
as 2:2007cv00289
Plaintiff: Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation and Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation
Defendant: An easement to construct, operate and maintain a 10-inch natural gas pipeline over 3.375 acres, more or less across three parcels located in Jackson County, West Virginia, owned by, Karroll Sue Dunlap, Tammie S. Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
United States of America v. 13.5 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Cabell County, State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2005cv00089
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
United States v. 0.12 Acre of Land, et al
as 1:2004cv00384
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
Camp, et al v. City of White Sulphu
as 5:2003cv00501
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States v. 0.13 Acre, More/Less, et al
as 2:1999cv01060
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?