US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 3,652
LoRusso v. Brooks
as 2:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony LoRusso
Defendant:
Mo Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Alabama, State of
as 7:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Lavarice Wilson
Defendant:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Bibb County Correctional Facility
as 7:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Deonte Hudson
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez-Sandoval v. United States of America et al
as 7:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Eva Mendez-Sandoval
Defendant:
United States of America and Eric Todd Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Vincent v. Gamble
as 2:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Santangelo De'Andrea Vincent
Defendant:
Mary Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kister v. Willis et al
as 2:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Bruce A Willis and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amerson v. Williams et al
as 5:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Brett S Amerson and Brett Steven Amerson
Defendant:
Martha E. Williams, Jonathan England, Joseph Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cleburn County Courthouse et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jason Omar Johnson
Defendant:
Cleburn County Courthouse and Calhoun County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 5:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lamar Aaron
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Alabama Deparment of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Kardell Ford
Defendant:
Alabama Deparment of Corrections, Kay Ivey, Bibb County Corrections Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
