Arizona Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Food Services Incorporated of Gainesville v. Mead
as 4:2025cv00103
Plaintiff:
Food Services Incorporated of Gainesville
Defendant:
Tim Mead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Koegel v. Fronk et al
as 2:2024cv03484
Defendant:
Canadian Cardlock, Unknown Parties, Imo's Country Store #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Koegel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02329
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Watson v. Financial Center First Credit Union
as 2:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Ernest Watson
Defendant:
Financial Center First Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrument
Bank of America NA v. Carver
as 3:2024cv08002
Plaintiff:
Bank of America NA
Defendant:
Taylor A Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bank of America NA v. Carver
as 3:2023cv08538
Plaintiff:
Bank of America NA
Defendant:
Taylor A Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kamin Health LLC et al v. 4D Global LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01491
Plaintiff:
Kamin Health LLC and Precious Care Management LLC
Defendant:
4D Global LLC and Chanie Gluck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
UNIDEF Birleik Savunma San. ve Tic. A.S. v. Profense LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
UNIDEF Birleik Savunma San. ve Tic. A.S.
Defendant:
Profense LLC and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Trabucco v. Cogan
as 3:2023cv08096
Plaintiff:
Arnaldo Trabucco
Defendant:
Jeffrey A Cogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Gray v. CTP Funding
as 2:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Michele R Gray
Defendant:
CTP Funding
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
