Arkansas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 201 - 210 of 954
Reichert v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 4:2017cv00389
Plaintiff:
Michael Reichert
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1471
Ashine et al v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2017cv00382
Plaintiff:
Ehetenesh Ashine and Jeron Holloway
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services and Cindy Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Brown v. Paypal Inc
as 2:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Valarie Brown
Defendant:
Paypal Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
ARcare Inc v. Amedisys Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00351
Defendant:
Amedisys Inc and Amedisys Arkansas LLC
Plaintiff:
ARcare Inc and ARcare Inc An Arkansas Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarily situated doing business as ARcare 18
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. GMA Investments LLC
as 4:2017cv00340
Plaintiff:
Shantrelle Brooks
Defendant:
GMA Investments LLC and GMA Investments LLC doing business as Summit Receivables
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Case name not on file
as 5:2017mc00055
Respondent:
Tinnus Enterprises, LLC and ZURU Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Davis Neurology PA v. CBS Medical Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Davis Neurology PA
Defendant:
CBS Medical Inc and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bridges v. Humana Inc
as 4:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
Sue Bridges
Defendant:
Humana Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Nance v. 1-800 Contacts Inc
as 4:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Tyler Nance
Defendant:
1-800 Contacts Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System v. Charles Murphy Holley, Jr. et al
as 5:2017cv05053
Plaintiff:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Movant:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Respondent:
Charles Murphy Holley, Jr.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Michael T Duke
Intervenor:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
