US District Court for the Eastern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,784
(HC) Quintero v. Lemon
as 1:2022cv01568
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Quintero
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Abegunde v. FCI Mendota Warden
as 1:2022cv01550
Petitioner:
Olufolajimi Abegunde
Respondent:
FCI Mendota Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Dugger v. Brewer
as 2:2022cv02142
Petitioner:
Timothy Dugger
Respondent:
D. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Noble v. Trate
as 1:2022cv01537
Petitioner:
Chad Noble
Respondent:
Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC)Bradley v. Brewer
as 2:2022cv02120
Petitioner:
Kristopher B. Bradley
Respondent:
Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Triggs-Nunez
as 2:2022at01209
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Triggs-Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Triggs-Nunez v. California Department of Corrections
as 2:2022cv02122
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Triggs-Nunez
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC)Heath v. Warden at FCI Mendota
as 1:2022cv01529
Petitioner:
Randall Heath
Respondent:
Warden at FCI Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Valera v. The People of the State of California, CDCR
as 1:2022cv01522
Petitioner:
Joel Valera
Respondent:
The People of the State of California, CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Head v. Warden, FCI Mendota
as 1:2022cv01512
Petitioner:
Charles Head
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
