US District Court for the Eastern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,440
(HC) Scroggins v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Scroggins
Defendant:
Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Gonsalves v. Superior Court Antelope Valley et al
as 1:2024cv00516
Petitioner:
Anthony David Gonsalves, Jr.
Respondent:
Superior Court Antelope Valley and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Wilhelm v. Mule Creek State Prison
as 2:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Steve Wilhelm
Respondent:
Mule Creek State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01220
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Saintillus v. USA
as 2:2024cv01211
Petitioner:
Chaloner Saintillus
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Williams v. Borla
as 2:2024cv01197
Petitioner:
Cameron Williams
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Khouanmany v. Painter
as 2:2024cv01189
Petitioner:
Vilaychith Khonamany
Respondent:
Daniel K. Painter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Salazar-Mendoza v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Alejandro Salazar-Mendoza
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Hernandez v. Covello
as 1:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
Jose Hernandez
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Dean v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01173
Petitioner:
David Dean
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
