US District Court for the Eastern District of California Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 101
Autry v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2014at00776
Plaintiff:
Penny Autry
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Autry v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01635
Plaintiff:
Penny Autry
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Joann Linan v. Foster Poultry Farms
as 1:2014cv01625
Plaintiff:
Joann Linan
Defendant:
Foster Poultry Farms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Linan v. Foster Poultry Farms
as 1:2014at00770
Plaintiff:
Joann Linan
Defendant:
Foster Poultry Farms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Mota et al
as 1:2014at00669
Defendant:
Ines Mota and Merced Faculty Associates Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mota v Merced Faculty Associates Medical Group, Incorporated
as 1:2014cv01398
Plaintiff:
Ines Mota
Defendant:
Merced Faculty Associates Medical Group, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stuit v. Pepsi Beverages Company
as 2:2014cv01350
Defendant:
Pepsi Beverages Company
Plaintiff:
Loren Stuit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stuit v. Pepsi Beverages Company, a.k.a., PBC, a.k.a., The Pepsi Bottling Group, a.k.a., PBG
as 2:2014at00719
Defendant:
Pepsi Beverages Company, a.k.a., PBC, a.k.a., The Pepsi Bottling Group, a.k.a., PBG
Plaintiff:
Loren Stuit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Canupp v. Children's Receiving Home of Sacramento
as 2:2014at00608
Defendant:
Children's Receiving Home of Sacramento
Plaintiff:
Tina Canupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Canupp v. Children's Receiving Home of Sacramento
as 2:2014cv01185
Plaintiff:
Tina Canupp
Defendant:
Children's Receiving Home of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
