US District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,393
Wilkins v. City of Martinez
as 4:2024cv02389
Plaintiff:
Todd Wilkins
Defendant:
City of Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robnett v. City of San Jose et al
as 5:2024cv02385
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Robnett
Defendant:
City of San Jose and San Jose Police & Fire Department Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Elbaum v. Google, Inc.
as 4:2024cv02294
Plaintiff:
Saul Elbaum
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin v. ABC Legal Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
ABC Legal Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Austin v. Kia America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc., Epiq Global, Susan Illston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Barukzai v. City and County of San Francisco
as 3:2024cv02274
Plaintiff:
Masoud Barukzai
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al
as 4:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Patterson
Defendant:
FNU Matsui, FNU Alexander and San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arakji v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 5:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Mazen Arakji
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Amazon, Apple Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
L. v. County of Trinity et al
as 3:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
S. L.
Defendant:
County of Trinity, Tim Saxon, Ron Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singh v. Jonas et al
as 4:2024cv02162
Defendant:
Jaswinder Singh Bains, Priyanka Chopra Jonas, Tiger Shroff and others
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
