US District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 7,388
v. County Counsel Office of San Mateo
as 3:2024cv00359
Defendant:
County Counsel Office of San Mateo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sporer v. County of San Mateo
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sporer
Defendant:
San Mateo County Counsel, County of San Mateo, Iliana Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Struve v. Salgado et al
as 5:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
COREY TERILL STRUVE
Defendant:
ARTURO SALGADO and MICHELLE KIMBLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fried v. City of Pleasant Hill
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
William Zhang Fried
Defendant:
City of Pleasant Hill, City of Concord, Jacob Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amare v. Safeway Corporation
as 5:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Daniel Amare
Defendant:
Safeway Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez et al v. Santa Clara County et al
as 5:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Laura Janeth Gonzalez, Minor Ethan Noe Gonzalez and E. N. G.
Defendant:
Santa Clara County, REH Lisa Flores, City of Mountain View and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bettencourt v. City of San Leandro et al
as 3:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Bettencourt
Defendant:
City of San Leandro, Abdul D. Pridgen, Matthew Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jose v. Matthews et al
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Bettencourt Antonio Jose
Defendant:
Brady Matthews, Stephen Young, Abdul D. Pridgen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calderon v. City of San Jose et al
as 5:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Calderon
Defendant:
City of San Jose and J Rodriguez Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silmi v. Hampton
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Amjad Silmi
Defendant:
Mojukhan Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
