US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 10,141
Khaliqi v. Covello
as 4:2023cv04359
Petitioner:
Mohammad Khaliqi
Respondent:
Acting Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillippi v. Warden, Kern Valley State Prison
as 4:2023cv04403
Petitioner:
Bruce Phillippi
Respondent:
Warden, Kern Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Olson
as 1:2023cv04219
Petitioner:
Eric C. Olson
Respondent:
Amador County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peasley v. People of the State of California
as 3:2023cv04218
Petitioner:
David S. Peasley
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Warden McVay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re to the Matter of Steven Wayne Bonilla
as 4:2023cv04217
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKevie v. State of California
as 3:2023cv04213
Petitioner:
Demarius McKevie
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singleton v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 5:2023cv04140
Petitioner:
Damari William Singleton
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals, USP Victorville Warden and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Raybon v. U.S. Federal Court
as 5:2023cv04141
Petitioner:
Goldy Raybon
Respondent:
U.S. Federal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla
as 4:2023cv03972
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdez v. Mattke
as 3:2023cv03967
Petitioner:
Ismael Valdez
Defendant:
Justin Mattke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.