US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 24,297
Rojas v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
as 4:2022cv03926
Plaintiff: Robert Eugene Rojas
Defendant: California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claros v. Bloomfield et al
as 4:2022cv03922
Plaintiff: Leandro Claros
Defendant: Ron Bloomfield and Howard E. Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Patterson et al
as 4:2022cv03927
Plaintiff: Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant: S. Patterson, A. Scotland, R. M. Torrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Calderon v. Covello
as 5:2022cv03881
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent: P Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buchanan
as 3:2022cv03836
Plaintiff: Whittier Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Thompson et al
as 4:2022cv03802
Plaintiff: Kenneth Adrian Fuller
Defendant: Karen Thompson, Dr. Correa, Kathleen Pozzy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03806
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03834
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gomez v. San Quentin State Prison Warden
as 5:2022cv03741
Petitioner: Mario Edwin Gomez
Respondent: San Quentin State Prison Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrant v. Sacramento County Jail
as 4:2022cv03801
Plaintiff: Larry Winn Arrant
Defendant: Sacramento County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?