US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 6,981
Bonilla v. Smiley et al
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Charles Smiley, Clarence Don Clay, Tim Wagstaffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin v. Google.com et al
as 4:2023cv06659
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Google.com, YouTube.com, Alexis Bynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Butler
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Foster
Defendant:
Judge Pamela Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. West Ann's California Penal Code Book
as 5:2023cv06630
Plaintiff:
Simon Chan
Defendant:
West Anns California Penal Code Book
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quarles v. County of Contra Costa
as 5:2023cv06636
Plaintiff:
Christopher Quarles
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Somners
as 5:2023cv06593
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Foster
Defendant:
Steve Somners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Taylor et al
as 5:2023cv06595
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Foster
Defendant:
Kathryne Taylor and Federal Bureau of Investigations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. Zhou et al
as 1:2023cv06561
Plaintiff:
Jacobi Gaines
Defendant:
Y. Zhou, M. Jaejer, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Facebook et al
as 4:2023cv06554
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Facebook, Tyler Harmon, Paul Bonanno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullom v. Alameda County District Attorney's Office
as 4:2023cv06553
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee McCullom
Defendant:
Alameda County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
