US District Court for the Southern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 264
Walloch v. Mariner Finance, LLC
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Richard Walloch
Defendant:
Mariner Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Diaz v. Comenity Bank
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Sergio L. Diaz
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charman v. Viral Empire LLC.,
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Thane Charman
Defendant:
Viral Empire LLC.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charman v. Vertical Infill, Inc
as 3:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Thane Charman
Defendant:
Vertical Infill, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brady v. LendingClub Bank, National Association
as 3:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Michael Brady
Defendant:
LendingClub Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bermudez Iglesias v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Bermudez Iglesias
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rodriguez Sanchez v. Comenity Bank
as 3:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Rodriguez Sanchez
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cervantes v. Synchrony Bank
as 3:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maltman Cervantes
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tom v. Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Tom
Defendant:
Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tom v. TrueAccord Corp.
as 3:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Tom
Defendant:
TrueAccord Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
