US District Court for the Southern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 259
Velarde v. American Express National Bank
as 3:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Monica Velarde
Defendant:
American Express National Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Velarde v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Monica Velarde
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alexander, Jr. v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Curtis T. Alexander, Jr.
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alexander, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Curtis T. Alexander, Jr.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alexander v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Curtis T. Alexander, Jr.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Diaz v. Comenity Bank
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Sergio L. Diaz
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Walloch v. Mariner Finance, LLC
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Richard Walloch
Defendant:
Mariner Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charman v. Viral Empire LLC.,
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Thane Charman
Defendant:
Viral Empire LLC.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charman v. Vertical Infill, Inc
as 3:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Thane Charman
Defendant:
Vertical Infill, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brady v. LendingClub Bank, National Association
as 3:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Michael Brady
Defendant:
LendingClub Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
