US District Court for the Southern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 255
Kwon v. US Bank National Association
as 3:2023cv01192
Plaintiff:
Chemy Kwon
Defendant:
US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Them v. Mechanics Bank
as 3:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Joshua Them
Defendant:
Mechanics Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Davenport v. R.M. Galicia, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Sara Davenport
Defendant:
R.M. Galicia, Inc. doing business as Progressive Management Systems
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Trinsey v. SoFi Lending Corp.
as 3:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Trinsey
Defendant:
SoFi Lending Corp. doing business as SoFi
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fairchild v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
as 3:2023cv01173
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fairchild
Defendant:
USAA Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fairchild v. Discover Bank
as 3:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Cyndie Fairchild
Defendant:
Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Thompson v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Thompson
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Johnson v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Johnson
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Stark v. Credit Control, LLC
as 3:2023cv01176
Plaintiff:
Eric Stark
Defendant:
Credit Control, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charman v. Coale et al
as 3:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
Thane Charman
Defendant:
Onyx Coale and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
