US District Court for the Southern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 252
Medina v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 3:2023cv02209
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Medina
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Medina v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Medina
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Williams v. Capital One, N.A.
as 3:2023cv02208
Plaintiff:
Darcy Williams
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Williams v. Ally Bank
as 3:2023cv02210
Plaintiff:
Darcy Williams
Defendant:
Ally Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Castillo v. Discover Bank
as 3:2023cv02206
Plaintiff:
Rogerio Castillo
Defendant:
Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Omahony v. US Bank National Association
as 3:2023cv02192
Plaintiff:
Troy A Omahony
Defendant:
US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charman v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
Thane Charman
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc. doing business as Spectrum
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Williams v. Upgrade, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02084
Plaintiff:
Darcy Williams
Defendant:
Upgrade, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charman v. Sethi, et al
as 3:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Thane Charman
Defendant:
Hammeet Sethi and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fieck v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01957
Plaintiff:
Erin Fieck
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
