US District Court for the Southern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 255
Rubottom v. Dealstruck, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01833
Plaintiff:
Edward Rubottom
Defendant:
Dealstruck, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rezac v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01828
Plaintiff:
Christine Rezac
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wanser v. Capital One, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01829
Plaintiff:
Amy Wanser
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Castellanos v. The CBE Group, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01769
Plaintiff:
Felipe Castellanos
Defendant:
The CBE Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Quillar v. US Bank, National Association
as 3:2023cv01742
Plaintiff:
Teraizel Quillar
Defendant:
US Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Quillar v. T.D. Bank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01744
Plaintiff:
Teraizel Quillar
Defendant:
T.D. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fairchild v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fairchild
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Weschta v. Sunlight Solar Inc
as 3:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Weschta
Defendant:
Sunlight Solar Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fairchild v. American Express National Bank
as 3:2023cv01709
Plaintiff:
Cyndie Fairchild
Defendant:
American Express National Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Adams v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2023cv01711
Plaintiff:
Brittany Adams
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
