US District Court for the Southern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 264
Vazquez v. Comenity Bank
as 3:2022cv02003
Plaintiff:
Elba Vazquez
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Medrano v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 3:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
Aurora Medrano
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Department Stores National Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rosandich v. Synchrony Bank
as 3:2022cv01948
Plaintiff:
Patricia Rosandich
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rosandich v. Comenity Bank
as 3:2022cv01949
Plaintiff:
Patricia Rosandich
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kotch v. Synchrony Bank
as 3:2022cv01928
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Kotch
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kotch v. Discover Bank
as 3:2022cv01935
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Kotch
Defendant:
Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lapointe v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2022cv01879
Plaintiff:
Janice Lapointe
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jasso v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2022cv01847
Plaintiff:
Hector Cureno Jasso
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Murray v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2022cv01848
Plaintiff:
Bryan Murray
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Grill v. Goldman Sachs Bank USA
as 3:2022cv01845
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Grill
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
