District Court Cases in California

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 587,742
Chug Bud, LLC v. Del Curto
as 4:2022cv05429
Plaintiff: Chug Bud, LLC
Defendant: DiMarco Del Curto doing business as Booze Missile
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05405
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mills v. Deems et al
as 3:2022cv05433
Plaintiff: Rodney James Mills
Defendant: Michael R. Deems and Michael F. Tufaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamb v. Kia America, Inc
as 4:2022cv05434
Plaintiff: Bethan C. Lamb
Defendant: Kia America, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bonilla v. San Benito County Court Clerk's Office
as 4:2022cv05431
Plaintiff: Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant: San Benito County Court Clerk's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Hunter v. Utility Traffic Control Services, Inc.
as 4:2022cv05435
Defendant: Utility Traffic Control Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05437
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05439
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Emberton v. San Francisco City Government
as 3:2022cv05440
Plaintiff: Mihal Emberton
Defendant: San Francisco City Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Peaster Davis v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv05441
Plaintiff: Angie Peaster Davis
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?