California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,982
Faisal Ashraf v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Faisal Ashraf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Joseph Lawrence Diaz v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv03589
Petitioner:
Joseph Lawrence Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Asley Acosta v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv03551
Petitioner:
Asley Acosta
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Zamora Castellanos v. USA
as 3:2024cv00674
Petitioner:
Leonardo Zamora Castellanos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davenport v. USA
as 2:2024cv01048
Petitioner:
Jesse Earl Davenport
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Firle v. USA (2255 - 21-cr-0043-JAM)
as 2:2024cv00888
Petitioner:
Christopher Firle
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TESTvh09e8rh95e8hve v. USA
as 3:2024cv01734
Petitioner:
Billy TESTvh09e8rh95e8hve
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kavuru v. USA
as 5:2024cv01735
Petitioner:
Kishore Kumar Kavuru
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scaggs v. USA
as 3:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Leonard Scaggs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Adolfo Schoneke v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02426
Petitioner:
Adolfo Schoneke
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
