US District Court for the District of Colorado Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 3,628
Podlucky (PS) v. USA
as 1:2023cv03111
Plaintiff:
Gregory Joseph Podlucky
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Podlucky (PS) v. USA
as 1:2023cv03113
Plaintiff:
Gregory Joseph Podlucky
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark (PS) v. Creighton et al
as 1:2023cv03099
Plaintiff:
Shaun Allen Clark
Defendant:
Tanner J. Creighton, Adams County Sheriff Dept., Adams County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman (PS) v. Markham
as 1:2023cv03064
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Markham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo Campos (PS) v. USA
as 1:2023cv03036
Plaintiff:
Jose Murillo Campos
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henard (PS) v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2023cv03072
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Henard
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Jeff Shradder, Vital Core and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henard (PS) v. County of Jefferson et al
as 1:2023cv03069
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Henard
Defendant:
County of Jefferson, Jeff Shradder, Well Path and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman (PS) v. Cardenas et al
as 1:2023cv03030
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Cardenas, Bryant and Roland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Matevousain et al
as 1:2023cv03013
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Petty
Defendant:
Andre Matevousain, Andrew Ciolli, J. Sturgill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaneck v. Core Civic of America et al
as 1:2023cv03009
Plaintiff:
Joseph Vaneck
Defendant:
Core Civic of America, Tejinder Singh and Christianna Cappellucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
