US District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Rights Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 9,609
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00986
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rajkarnikar v. Hamdi
as 3:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Nirjala Rajkarnikar
Defendant:
Sami Hamdi
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00984
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Britt v. Moulette et al
as 3:2024cv00980
Defendant:
Miguel Moulette, Megan O'Shea and Commissioner of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Charles Lamont Britt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Riehl et al
as 3:2024cv00993
Defendant:
Judicial Marshals of G.A.23 New Haven, Clifford, Calistro and others
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Marquise Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Treadwell et al
as 3:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Marc T. Treadwell, Sonja Profit, Charles H. Weigle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00962
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hines et al v. Sirchrsy Systems et al
as 3:2024cv00969
Defendant:
Judges 915 Lafayette Blvd, Sirchrsy Systems, Charles Town Acts and others
Plaintiff:
Telly Hines and Marquese Hines
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
