Connecticut Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 4,334
Rajkarnikar v. Bloomfield Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Nirjala Rajkarnikar
Defendant:
Bloomfield Police Department, Waterbury Hospital, Sama LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hines v. Trump et al
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Mary and others
Hines v. Given et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Earl Given, Donald Trump, DM Has (YAS) and others
Young v. Razz-Wellington et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
James Young
Defendant:
Jenna Razz-Wellington, Dimitar Sadiev, Richard Peck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brookins v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Rev. Juan-Jose Brookins, Jawan Bey and Juan-Jose Brookins
Defendant:
Roberta Napolitano, Janet Yellen, Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Germain v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Henley V. Germain
Defendant:
U.S. National Bank Association, Sawarn Singh, Gerald M. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosa v. Connecticut Judicial Branch et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Defendant:
Connecticut Judicial Branch, Fairfield County, Bridgeport Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rosa
Harris v. Ganim et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Respondent:
Joe Ganim, Michael C. Jankovsky, Roderick Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hines v. 123 Hoyt Street et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
123 Hoyt Street and 172 Golden Hill Street
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
