Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 1,009
Irizarry v. Rodriguez
as 3:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Irizarry
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albarran-Gonzal et al v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Joel Albarran-Gonzal and Jason Turoczi
Defendant:
Maldonado, Semple, Gary Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Rodriguez
as 3:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Gary Gray
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo v. Sample et al
as 3:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Rafael Castillo
Defendant:
Sample and Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Rashane Powell
Defendant:
Semple and Connecticut Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toliver et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Toliver and Roger P. Cote'
Defendant:
Semple and Osborn C.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Richard Parker
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Sharonda Carlos, Robert Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tsuma v. Connecticut Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Emile I. Tsuma, Sr.
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Correction, Bridgeport Correctional Center, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simms v. Osborn Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Simms
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
