US District Court for the District of Delaware Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,448
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nasir v. Nasir et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Malik Nasir
Defendant:
Naima Nasir, Register of Wills, Court of Chancery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Happle et al v. Ishbia et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle and Carla Happle
Defendant:
Mat Ishbia, James Daras, McCalla Raymer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Happle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Kathleen Wilson, Doctor John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sam's Auto Wholesale, Inc. v. The Auto Gallery
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Sam's Auto Wholesale, Inc.
Defendant:
The Auto Gallery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chrustowski v. LifeHouse Church et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
LifeHouse Church, Middletown Police Department, Clayton Fire House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
