Delaware Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 4,018
Harris v. Emig et al
as 1:2025cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jordan O. Harris
Defendant:
Brian Emig, Stacy Hollis, Centurion/Vital Core Health Strategies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hermann v. USA
as 1:2025cv00172
Petitioner:
Michael Hermann
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Burton v. Primos et al
as 1:2025cv00171
Plaintiff:
Azeem Jaleel Burton
Defendant:
Noel Eason Primos, Lindsay Taylor, Reneta Green-Streett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Burley et al
as 1:2025mc00071
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Katrina Burley and Bureau Chief
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pritchard v. Montgomery-Reeves et al
as 1:2025cv00149
Petitioner:
Andrew Hamilton Pritchard
Respondent:
Judge Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves, Judge Patty Shwartz, Judge Anthony J. Scirica and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Records
as 1:2025mc00061
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Mike Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Mental Health Review Committee
as 1:2025mc00059
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Mental Health Review Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Kromka et al
as 1:2025mc00060
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Floyd Kromka and Chief Bureau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velez-Santiago v. Esposito et al
as 1:2025cv00126
Plaintiff:
Wilson Junior Velez-Santiago
Defendant:
Gregory C. Esposito, Mathew J. Nelson, Payton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. May et al
as 1:2025cv00127
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Chambers
Defendant:
Beth Bittner, Bureau Chief, Bureau Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
