US District Court for the District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 10,635
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03530
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
CEASAR v. ROBERTS
as 1:2024cv03489
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR.
Plaintiff:
OSCAR CEASAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KILGORE v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2024cv03493
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, DONALD TRUMP and SECRET SERVICE MEN & WOMEN
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY STUART KILGORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03499
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
FRICK v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv03491
Plaintiff:
TYLER FRICK
Defendant:
ALAINA JENKINS, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, SEAN MCCLUSKIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PARK v. BREHMBHATT
as 1:2024cv03465
Plaintiff:
SHINOK PARK
Defendant:
MILAN N. BREHMBHATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. NEWBERG et al
as 1:2024cv03471
Plaintiff:
PETER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PAUL M GUNNING, JOSEPH M GOFFMAN, JAN DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
