District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 4,978
CRAWFORD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAYOR
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
MIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAYOR
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
CRAWFORD vs. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAYOR
as 1:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
MIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAYOR
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
MARSH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Anthony Marsh II and ANTHONY MARSH, II
Not Yet Classified:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
Anthony Delborrell, JOHN BEWLEY and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
VANDERPLOEG v. BLINKEN
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
BELGIN J. VANDERPLOEG
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
SMITH THEE v. U.S. SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. SMITH THEE
Defendant:
SECRET SERVICE and U.S. SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
PAGE v. EVANS
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. PAGE
Defendant:
MONICA H. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, EMMET G. SULLIVAN, PHH MORTGAGE ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ROLLINS v. OTTMAN
as 1:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA ROLLINS
Defendant:
JULIE OTTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ISOM v. NELSON
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
JANE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SOOS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
EMERY SOOS
Defendant:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and WALT C. DANNENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
