District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 4,978
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
REEVE v. MONEX INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
REBECCA REEVE
Defendant:
MONEX INC, JOHN GREEN and GREGORY LYUMKIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARKS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
CHAD MARKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURT et al v. CHIEF OF POLICE AND ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT, U.S. CONSTITUTION and AMERICAN HERITAGE COLLEGE DICTIONARY
Defendant:
CHIEF OF POLICE AND ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAO v. HAYDEN
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
DONGFANG SHAO
Defendant:
CARLA HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
JAMIE DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
CLEMENT v. WASHINGTON POST
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CLEMENT
Defendant:
WASHINGTON POST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
WOODRUFF v. HOLBROOK et al
as 1:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN L. WOODRUFF
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLBROOK, BRYAN POTTER and MARK C. COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CENTRAL DISTRICT STATION
as 1:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
CENTRAL DISTRICT STATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. NATIONAL PROPERTY BOARD et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WALKER
Defendant:
NATIONAL PROPERTY BOARD, ANDREAS TEN BERGE, URLIKA FRANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
