U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 223
McLean v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 8:2025cv00431
Plaintiff:
Holly McLean
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Dean v. Roku Inc.
as 8:2024cv02383
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dean
Defendant:
Roku Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Dean v. Meta Platforms Inc
as 8:2024cv02242
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dean
Defendant:
Facebook Inc and Meta Platforms Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025 Clayton Act
Veamcast Corp. v. Middle District of Florida, Tampa
as 8:2024cv02111
Interested Party:
Joseph Dean
Plaintiff:
Veamcast Corp.
Defendant:
Middle District of Florida, Tampa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Veamcast Corp. v. Mclaren et al
as 8:2024cv02112
Plaintiff:
Veamcast Corp.
Defendant:
Scott Mclaren and Hill Ward Henderson
Interested Party:
Joseph Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Veamcast Corp. v. Roku Inc.
as 8:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Veamcast Corp.
Interested Party:
Joseph Dean
Defendant:
Roku Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Silva v. Powell
as 3:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Christopher Logan Silva
Defendant:
Jerome Hayden Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Watson Realty Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J. Arko, Andrew M. Moore and others
Defendant:
Watson Realty Corp., Premiere Plus Realty Co., Charles Rutenberg Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Owens v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Jordan Owens
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Antitrust
Walters v. State of Florida
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Bryan Walters
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
