U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida Social Security Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,173
ENGSTROM v. KIJAKAZI

as 4:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Michael Shawn Engstrom
Defendant:
Secretary Social Security and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
GAMELL v. MAYS et al

as 3:2023cv24097
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CARLTON GAMELL, JR
Defendant:
M MAYS and KILOLO KAJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
EDWARDS v. KIJAKAZI

as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
HERSHEL EDWARDS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LOPEZ v. KIJAKAZI

as 3:2023cv15549
Plaintiff:
OSIRIS EDWARD LOPEZ
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
JACKSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2023cv14428
Plaintiff:
EUGENE W. JACKSON and EUGENE W JACKSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ZORN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
ROGER JAMES ZORN, SR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DAVIS v. KIJAKAZI

as 3:2023cv09939
Plaintiff:
JEREMY WILEY DAVIS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SHEPHERD v. KIJAKAZI

as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
VINCENT SCOTT SHEPHERD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
POSEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 3:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
DAVID RUSSELL POSEY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
JONES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
IAN E. JONES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.